ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the skeletal stability of joint orthognathic and orthodontic treatment for cleft patients compared with non-cleft patients.Methods Fifteen cleft patient diagnosed with dental facial deformities underwent joint orthognathic and orthodontic treatment.Cephalometric analysis was carried out at T0 (before treatment),T1 (2 weeks after surgery),T2 (6 months after surgery) and T3 (24 months after surgery).The comparison of maxillary anterior-posterior and superiorinferior movement was performed with non-cleft orthognathic group (n =15) at the same follow-up time point.Results The maxilla was move forward for (3.8 ± 1.5) mm and downward for (2.4± 0.8) mm of cleft group.The relapse distance was (1.2±-0.7) mm (T1-T2:31.6％) in AP direction and (0.9±0.6) mm (T1-T2:37.5％) in vertical direction.At the time of 24 months after operation,the relapse distance was (1.0±0.5) mm (T1-T3:26.0％) in AP direction and (0.8±0.8) mm (T1-T3:33.3％) vertically.In non-cleft group,the maxilla was move (4.3±1.2) mm anteriorly and (2.2± 1.9) mm vertically.The relapse distance was (0.9±1.2) mm (T1-T2:20.9％) anteriorly and (0.8± 0.9) mm (T1-T2:36.6％) vertically at 6 months post-operatively.At 24 months after surgery the relapse distance was (1.1±0.6) mm (T1-T3:25.6％) anteriorly and (0.9±0.5) mm (T1-T3:40.9％) vertically.There were no statistical significant in both 6 months and 24 months follow-up between cleft and non-cleft group (P＞0.05).Conclusions There is no statistic difference of post-surgical relapse rate between cleft and non-cleft orthognathic and orthodontic treatments,although the relapse distances are greater than that in cleft group.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To investgate the effect of Herbst appliance on the growth and remodeling of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in class Ⅱ patients with mandibular retrusion by using MRI.@*Methods@#Between December 2010 and October 2014, 12 class Ⅱ patients (11-16 years old) with mandibular retrusion were chosen. The patients were divided into two groups. The control group included 7 patients (14 joints) with normal disc condyle relationship and the anterior disc displacement (ADD) group included 5 patients (10 joints) with anterior disc displacement. The MRI images of TMJ were measured, including condylar height, joint space index and disc position ratio, before and after the treatment.@*Results@#The condylar height of the patients in the control group was significantly increased (P<0.001) after treatment, and no significant difference in joint space index (P=0.821) and disc position ratio (P=0.146) was found. The joint space index of the patients ([-14.70±8.82]% and [4.90±11.35]%) in ADD group changed significantly (P<0.001) after treatment, and no significant difference in condylar height (P=0.294) and disc position ratio (P=0.120) was found.@*Conclusions@#The normal disc condyle relationship was beneficial to the reconstruction of the condylar process, and the increase of the condylar height. The condyle moved forward in patients with anterior disc displacement after treatment.